🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.