🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.