🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment instead of a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show launched last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. While he is called Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to question.