🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to resume discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The US president last week said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making confidence hard to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to impose their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the wake of this attack."