🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting changes to a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about industry interference with health policies. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Moreover, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.